Thread Synchronization with Condition Variables or Tasks

In case you use promise and future to synchronize threads, they have much in common with condition variables. But most of the time, tasks are the better choice.

Synchronization of threads

To get the big picture, get the facts. The table compares condition variables with tasks (promise and future).

The benefit of a condition variable to a promise and future is, that you can use condition variables to synchronize threads multiple times. In opposite to that, a promise can send its notification only once. So you have to use more promise and future pairs to get the functionality of a condition variable. But if you use the condition variable only for one synchronization, the condition variable is a lot more difficult to use correctly. So a promise and future pair need no shared variable and, therefore, no lock; they are not prone to spurious wakeups or lost wakeups. In addition to that, they can handle exceptions. So there are a lot of reasons to prefer tasks to condition variables.

 

Modernes C++ Mentoring

Stay informed about my mentoring programs. Subscribe for the news.

• • • • • • • "Fundamentals for C++ Professionals" (open)
• • • • • • • "Design Patterns and Architectural Patterns with C++" (starts in February 2023)

 

Thank you! Please check your email and confirm the newsletter subscription.

Your subscription was updated

Email *

It seems that you have already subscribed to this list. Click here to update your profile.

Subscribe

How can I use tasks to synchronize threads?

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43

// promiseFutureSynchronize.cpp

#include <future>
#include <iostream>
#include <utility>


void doTheWork(){
  std::cout << "Processing shared data." << std::endl;
}

void waitingForWork(std::future<void>&& fut){

    std::cout << "Worker: Waiting for work." << std::endl;
    fut.wait();
    doTheWork();
    std::cout << "Work done." << std::endl;

}

void setDataReady(std::promise<void>&& prom){

    std::cout << "Sender: Data is ready."  << std::endl;
    prom.set_value();

}

int main(){

  std::cout << std::endl;

  std::promise<void> sendReady;
  auto fut= sendReady.get_future();

  std::thread t1(waitingForWork,std::move(fut));
  std::thread t2(setDataReady,std::move(sendReady));

  t1.join();
  t2.join();

  std::cout << std::endl;
  
}

Quite easy.

With the help of the promise sendReady (line 32), I get the future fut (line34). The promise signalizes, in this case by his return value void (std::promise<void> sendReady), that it is only capable of sending notifications. Both communications endpoints are moved into the threads t1 respectively t2 (lines 35 and 36). The future is waiting with its call fut.wait() (line 15) for the notification of the promise: prom.set_value() (line 24).

As well, the structure as the output of the program matches the program in den post about the condition variable.

What's next?

So that was the overview of the multithreading interface. Now it's time to have a deeper look into multithreading in C++. Although most programmers will and should never use the features of the C++ memory model, it gives you a deeper insight into the challenges of multithreading programming. The next post starts with an overview of the C++ memory model.  (Proofreader Alexey Elymanov)