In the last post C++ Core Guidelines: Type Erasure, I presented two ways to implement type erasure: void pointers and object orientation. In this post, I bridge dynamic polymorphism (object orientation) with static polymorphism (templates) to get type erasure with templates.
As our starting point and reminder, here is type erasure based on object orientation.
Type erasure with object-orientation
Type erasure with object-orientation boils down to an inheritance hierarchy.
The key point is that you can use instances of
Bar instead of an instance for
BaseClass. For further details, read the post C++ Core Guidelines: Type Erasure.
What are the pros and cons of this implementation with OO?
- Easy to implement
- Virtual dispatch
- Intrusive because the derived class must know about its base
Let’s see which drawbacks type erasure with templates solves.
Type erasure with templates
Here is the templates program, which corresponds to the previous OO program.
Okay, what is happening here? Don’t be irritated by the names
Model. They are typically used for type erasure in the literature. So I stick to them.
First of all. My
std::vector uses instances (1) of type
Object (2) and not pointers, such as in the first OO example. These instances can be created with arbitrary types because it has a generic constructor (3). Object has the
getName method (4), which is directly forwarded to the
getName of object. object is of type
std::shared_ptr<const Concept>. The
getName method of
Concept is pure virtual (5). Therefore, due to virtual dispatch, the
getName method of
Model (6) is used. In the end, the
getName methods of
Foo (8) are applied in the
printName function (7).
Here is the output of the program.
Of course, this implementation is type-safe.
I’m currently giving a C++ class. We quite often have discussions about error messages with templates; therefore, I was curious about the error messages if I change the classes
Bar a little bit. Here is the incorrect implementation:
I renamed the method
get (1) and to
Here are the error messages copied from the Compiler Explorer.
I start with the ugliest one from Clang 6.0.0 and end with the quite good one from GCC 8.2. The error message from MSVC 19 is something in between. I was astonished because I thought clang would produce the clearest error message.
I can only display half of the error message because it’s too much for one screenshot.
Please look carefully at the screenshot of GCC 8.2. It says: “27:20: error: ‘const struct Foo’ has no member named ‘getName’; did you mean ‘get_name’?”. Isn’t that great?
The error message from MSVC, particularly from Clang, is quite bad. This should not be the end of my post.
Now I want to solve the challenge: How can I detect if a given class has a specific method at compile time? In our case, the classes
Foo should have a method
getName. I played with SFINAE, experimented with the C++11 variant std::enable_if, and ended with the detection idiom, part of the library fundamental TS v2. You must include the header from the experimental namespace (1) to use it. Here is the modified example:
I added lines (1), (2), and (3). Line (2) deduces the member function type. std::declval from C++11 is a function that allows you to use member functions in expressions without needing to construct the object. The crucial part of the detection idiom is the function
std::experimental::is_detected from the type traits library in the
Let’s see what Clang 6.0.0 produces if I execute the program in the Compiler Explorer:
Wow! That is still too much output. To be honest. The state of the feature is still experimental. If you look carefully at the output of the error message and you search for
static_assert, , you find the answer you are looking for. Here are the first three lines of the output.
Great! At least you can grep for the string.”
No method getName available” in the error message.
Before I end the post, here are the pros and cons of type erasure with templates:
- Non-intrusive because the derived class doesn’t need to know the base class
- Virtual dispatch
- Difficult to implement
In the end, the difference between type erasure with object orientation and with templates mainly boils down to two points:
- Intrusive versus non-intrusive
- Easy versus challenging to implement
This is the end of my detour. in the next post, I will continue my journey through generic programming; to be more specific, I will write about concepts.
Thanks a lot to my Patreon Supporters: Matt Braun, Roman Postanciuc, Tobias Zindl, G Prvulovic, Reinhold Dröge, Abernitzke, Frank Grimm, Sakib, Broeserl, António Pina, Sergey Agafyin, Андрей Бурмистров, Jake, GS, Lawton Shoemake, Jozo Leko, John Breland, Venkat Nandam, Jose Francisco, Douglas Tinkham, Kuchlong Kuchlong, Robert Blanch, Truels Wissneth, Kris Kafka, Mario Luoni, Friedrich Huber, lennonli, Pramod Tikare Muralidhara, Peter Ware, Daniel Hufschläger, Alessandro Pezzato, Bob Perry, Satish Vangipuram, Andi Ireland, Richard Ohnemus, Michael Dunsky, Leo Goodstadt, John Wiederhirn, Yacob Cohen-Arazi, Florian Tischler, Robin Furness, Michael Young, Holger Detering, Bernd Mühlhaus, Matthieu Bolt, Stephen Kelley, Kyle Dean, Tusar Palauri, Dmitry Farberov, Juan Dent, George Liao, Daniel Ceperley, Jon T Hess, Stephen Totten, Wolfgang Fütterer, Matthias Grün, Phillip Diekmann, Ben Atakora, Ann Shatoff, Rob North, and Bhavith C Achar.
Thanks, in particular, to Jon Hess, Lakshman, Christian Wittenhorst, Sherhy Pyton, Dendi Suhubdy, Sudhakar Belagurusamy, Richard Sargeant, Rusty Fleming, John Nebel, Mipko, Alicja Kaminska, Slavko Radman, and David Poole.
|My special thanks to Embarcadero|
|My special thanks to PVS-Studio|
|My special thanks to Tipi.build|
|My special thanks to Take Up Code|
I’m happy to give online seminars or face-to-face seminars worldwide. Please call me if you have any questions.
- Embedded Programmierung mit modernem C++ 12.12.2023 – 14.12.2023 (Präsenzschulung, Termingarantie)
Standard Seminars (English/German)
Here is a compilation of my standard seminars. These seminars are only meant to give you a first orientation.
- C++ – The Core Language
- C++ – The Standard Library
- C++ – Compact
- C++11 and C++14
- Concurrency with Modern C++
- Design Pattern and Architectural Pattern with C++
- Embedded Programming with Modern C++
- Generic Programming (Templates) with C++
- Clean Code with Modern C++
- Phone: +49 7472 917441
- Mobil:: +49 176 5506 5086
- Mail: schulung@ModernesCpp.de
- German Seminar Page: www.ModernesCpp.de
- Mentoring Page: www.ModernesCpp.org
Modernes C++ Mentoring,